Ddevault/reforms

Draft: TechInc reforms

WIP proposal for some future ALV

Goals

• Implement a renewed sense of communal ownership and responsibility among space members over the association
• Reduce the workload and importance of the board

Renaming the board

I propose to rename the board, for internal purposes, to the Executors of Legal Faffery, and its members as "elfs", to reduce the sense that they hold a special position of authority in the space (alternative usage: Executors of Logistical Faffery, when called for). Naturally we can still refer to them as "the board" in official documents to the extent which is necessary to meet our legal obligations.

Reforming member introductions

The board should not be involved in onboarding new members; instead this responsibility should fall to other members. This requires:

• The completion of the effort to establish a membership maintenance system, such that the collection of important information is handled by an automated/idiot-proof system that does not require special board training
• A discussion among members to decide what kind of information should be conveyed to new members and to establish the cultural values we should be handing off to new members

Curtailing committees

The idea of an official, elected list of committees runs counter to the culture we should have. The committees mostly don't function for their intended purpose and all initiatives within TechInc should be informal, member-run grassroots affairs. The following committees should be removed and replaced with simple "projects" with no formally defined role:

• Media committee
• Space maintenance committee
• Event committee

The following committees should be retained:

• Auditing committee: this is useful for providing a check on the board and ensuring that we meet our legal and fiscal responsibilities
• Dispute committee: this is necessary for keeping the peace and moderating conflicts within the space, but should be reformed; see below

Modifying the role of the dispute committee

I propose a change to the dispute committee wherein:

• They can call for specific actions to resolve disputes, rather than relying on the board to do so, and
• Present their findings at an ALV (perhaps an out-of-schedule ALV if required) and call for a vote among members should they find certain sanctions to be appropriate (e.g. expulsion of members)

Thus, the board's power to sanction or remove members is rescinded and their role in organizational governance is reduced and handed over to the community.

TODO: Draft specific changes to the committee's policies and/or houserules