Difference between revisions of "ALV May 2014/Muse2"

From Technologia Incognita
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "= In a Nutshell = Previous ALV there were considerable points added to the agenda with no clear support or with no-one attending the ALV who proposed it. Although points subm...")
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
==Data on the vote==
 
==Data on the vote==
*Current Maintainer: [[[[Muse]]]]
+
*Current Maintainer: [[Muse]]
 
*Proposed for 2nd ALV in 2014
 
*Proposed for 2nd ALV in 2014
  

Revision as of 16:41, 24 March 2014

In a Nutshell

Previous ALV there were considerable points added to the agenda with no clear support or with no-one attending the ALV who proposed it. Although points submitted to the ALV should be clear enough to be votable, having the originator present can provide clarity and insights into the matter which prove invaluable. This point proposes to amend that. In concert, this point will also add a (small) barrier to votable points.

Data on the vote

  • Current Maintainer: Muse
  • Proposed for 2nd ALV in 2014


1a Vote

Points proposed to the agenda, will have a maintainer which will be present during the ALV to present the point and provide clarification on the topic. If none is present during the ALV, the membership can decide to postpone voting on the point to the next ALV.

The following point will be voted upon with a yes/no vote:

  All points proposed to the agenda of the ALV will have a designated maintainer. In principle this will be the 
  originator of the point but the responsibility can be transferred with mutual agreement of the current maintainer and his/her  
  replacement. The maintainer has a responsibility to appear during the ALV to present the point and provide clarification. 

1b Vote

If the maintainer is not present during the ALV the proposed point can be delayed until next ALV, unless the board decides the point is clear enough to be voted on.

The following point will be voted upon with a yes/no vote:

  Failure for the maintainer to appear on the ALV, will make the point eligible for transfer to the next ALV by the board.
  

1c Vote

Points proposed for the agenda should have at least two supporting votes by members on it. These members can also perform the function of maintainer for the purpose of presenting the point at the ALV.

The following point will be voted upon with a yes/no vote:

  A point proposed for the agenda of the ALV will have at least two supporting members on it, next to the maintainer. If no
  supporting votes have been found before the deadline, the point will not be eligible for that ALV.

1d Vote

Supporting members can also perform the function of maintainer for the purpose of presenting the point at the ALV.

The following point will be voted upon with a yes/no vote:

  Supporting members on a proposed point can also perform the function of maintainer for the purpose of appearing and 
  presenting the point during the ALV.