Difference between revisions of "Reply to no neutral ground in the burning world"

From Technologia Incognita
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "Reply to the "No Neutral Ground in a Burning World" lecture Awesome and amazing the talk by Ela & Quinn was, I am eager to push this topic even further, by offering you three...")
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Awesome and amazing the talk by Ela & Quinn was, I am eager to push this topic even further, by offering you three statements that I did not have time to formulate on the mike:
 
Awesome and amazing the talk by Ela & Quinn was, I am eager to push this topic even further, by offering you three statements that I did not have time to formulate on the mike:
  
* remember not only history, but PREhistory too
+
* it is important to remember not only history, but PREhistory too
 
* "at what price?" did we built the network that connected millions of people in the last 30 years...
 
* "at what price?" did we built the network that connected millions of people in the last 30 years...
 
* chemical weapons vs fertilizers -- only on the very short term is the later "a good thing" compared to the former  
 
* chemical weapons vs fertilizers -- only on the very short term is the later "a good thing" compared to the former  
  
 +
==Pre-History==
  
 +
I am glad that you have been looking back into the human history, in order to learn from previous examples/mistakes, and use that knowledge to understand present and even predict the future.
  
 +
However, "the recorded history" is a very short time period in the human existence. We somehow tend to "forget" that fact. Daniel Quinn, in "The Story of B",  names this "the great forgetting", and, like you, calls for "great remembering".
 +
 +
"State" is a very recent form of organization of society in the human cultures. First states developed few thousand years BC. There was 100's of thousands of years of human societies and cultures before that. Admittedly, on the short term it looks like "the state" is a very successful model of organisation, that won over all the other models. However, it is successful only on the relatively short term of 10.000 years.
 +
 +
Comparatively much longer period of human existence WITHOUT STATES also offers valuable knowledge about our past and present, and possibly gives us insight into, and alternatives for,  the future.
 +
 +
===Further reading===
 +
 +
* "Against His-Story, Against Leviathan" Fredy Perlman
 +
** http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Against_His-Story,_Against_Leviathan
 +
** http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/perlman-fredy/1977/revolutionary-leaders/index.htm
 +
** the whole book, chapter by chapter: http://noblesavagery.blogspot.nl/2007/03/fredy-perlmans-against-his-story.html
 +
 +
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Story_of_B
 +
** http://www.davidsheen.com/b/
 +
1) The Great Forgetting
 +
2) The Boiling Frog
 +
3) The Collapse of Values
 +
4) Population: A Systems Approach
 +
5) The Great Remembering
  
  

Revision as of 00:32, 28 December 2013

Reply to the "No Neutral Ground in a Burning World" lecture

Awesome and amazing the talk by Ela & Quinn was, I am eager to push this topic even further, by offering you three statements that I did not have time to formulate on the mike:

  • it is important to remember not only history, but PREhistory too
  • "at what price?" did we built the network that connected millions of people in the last 30 years...
  • chemical weapons vs fertilizers -- only on the very short term is the later "a good thing" compared to the former

Pre-History

I am glad that you have been looking back into the human history, in order to learn from previous examples/mistakes, and use that knowledge to understand present and even predict the future.

However, "the recorded history" is a very short time period in the human existence. We somehow tend to "forget" that fact. Daniel Quinn, in "The Story of B", names this "the great forgetting", and, like you, calls for "great remembering".

"State" is a very recent form of organization of society in the human cultures. First states developed few thousand years BC. There was 100's of thousands of years of human societies and cultures before that. Admittedly, on the short term it looks like "the state" is a very successful model of organisation, that won over all the other models. However, it is successful only on the relatively short term of 10.000 years.

Comparatively much longer period of human existence WITHOUT STATES also offers valuable knowledge about our past and present, and possibly gives us insight into, and alternatives for, the future.

Further reading

1) The Great Forgetting 2) The Boiling Frog 3) The Collapse of Values 4) Population: A Systems Approach 5) The Great Remembering


Two most important statements from your talk for me were:

  • how do YOU want the world to look like in 100 years?

and

  • "... in a Burning World".

However, I find that thinking in the time frame of 100 years ahead is too short; and I find that the Burning World requires even more attention, since the fundamental needs of all life on Earth -- including humans -- might disappear in less then 100 years, and certainly in the next 1000 years, unless we learn from our history & pregistory and take reponsibility over the culture we are living in, which governs the technologies we are deploying and to what end.