ALV May 2014

ALV May 2014
Date	2014/05/09
Time
Location	(h)ACTA
Type	Meeting
Contact	secretary@techinc.nl

 DRAFT *** DRAFT *** DRAFT ***

 THIS TEXT IS NOT FOR FREE EDITING!!! TO GET POINTS ADDED, MAIL secretary@techinc.nl 

Admin

(1.2) Approving the notes from the previous meeting

ALV_2014_January#Minutes

Reports

/ 2.2. Financial report 2014, to date (Brainsmoke)

• Monhtly reports to be seen here: Financials_2014
• status of the accounts
• expectations, based on the number of people paying "minimum" or "recommended" membership fees
• spendings from the board allowance
• financial outlook on the rest of 2014

/ 2.3. Membership report to date (Ctrl-K / Vesna)

• number of members on paper
• number of paying members
• number of people who are late
• number of canceled memberships due to late payment

/ 2.4. Notes from the board (Justa)

• Actions from the last ALV ALV_2014_January_actions
• other board news
• notable space news

/ 2.5 Report from the "members meetings" (Voidz0r / Realitygaps)

• how many members meetings happened?
• what were the results to date?

/ 2.6 Report from the "dispute committee" (Vesna / Realitigaps)

There was an action from the previous ALV "to decide who will be in the "dispute committee" " .

It is not clear if the dispute committee has been formed, or shall it be formed at this ALV.

If there was/is a "dispute committee", this is the time to present their work.

Or to vote to accept the members, by approval from the ALV.

Votable points

 DRAFT *** DRAFT *** DRAFT ***

 THIS TEXT IS NOT FOR FREE EDITING!!! TO GET POINTS ADDED, MAIL secretary@techinc.nl 

4.1. Previous ALV rules cleanup (Muse)

ALV_rules_cleanup , Muse

Previous ALV there were considerable rules added to the space which serve no true purpose (I'm looking at you *don't be on fire). This points proposes to clean up these rules. [edit]Data on the vote

4.1 a) Move "rules" to the "common sense rules display"

Current a lot of the voted on rules fall under 'common sense' and serve no good purpose being in the 'huishoudelijk regelement' This point proposes to move all points to a more general 'common sense' rule list on display in the space, without any disciplinary binding means. In essence 'unratifying' them. This allows the space rules to be more fluid and more open to change.

The following point will be voted upon with a yes/no vote:

 All rules voted into the 'huishoudelijk regelement' during the previous ALV will be moved onto a list of 'space-rules'. These rules    
 will be on display in the space.

4.1 b) Keep the rule about dangerous/fragile machines in HHR

The only rule on the huishoudelijk regelement to remain will be the dangerous tools/fragile machines rule.

The following point will be voted upon with a yes/no vote:

 Some machines can be marked 'instruction needed' by the owner or board. This means instruction is required before a member
 can use the machine for the first time. Qualified instructors will be the owner/maintainer of the machine or members that 
 previously received instructions for this machine.

4.2. Support for votable points (Muse, Philip)

ALV_Support_for_point Muse, Philip

Motivation

Previous ALV there were considerable points added to the agenda with no clear support or with no-one attending the ALV who proposed it. Although points submitted to the ALV should be clear enough to be votable, having the originator present can provide clarity and insights into the matter which prove invaluable. This point proposes to amend that. In concert, this point will also add a (small) barrier to votable points. User:Muse

At the January 2014 ALV we went through a large number of votable points that were poorly thought out, badly worded or both. For those items, the process seemed have been, put it on the wiki (or not even that), move it to the agenda even if nobody commented and expect the item to fixed there. And then we are stuck with it in the ALV. In my opinion, people who propose an item have to do the legwork to get it into shape. If nobody cares, then maybe an item just doesn't belong as a votable point on an ALV. So I propose is to have a minimum number of members who have to counter sign a votable point on the agenda of an ALV. The current statutes require 10% of the members with voting rights to allow members to force to board to organize an ALV. So I will use that as a starting point. Finally, the last part of the text is there to make sure that the board doesn't have to jump through hoops. It also allows issues that come up just before the agenda is finalized to be added by the board. User:Phicoh

4.2. a Vote

Points proposed to the agenda, will have a maintainer which will be present during the ALV to present the point and provide clarification on the topic. If none is present during the ALV, the membership can decide to postpone voting on the point to the next ALV. If the maintainer is not present during the ALV the proposed point can be delayed until next ALV, unless the board decides the point is clear enough to be voted on. If the maintainer is not present during the ALV the proposed point can be delayed until next ALV, unless the board decides the point is clear enough to be voted on.

The following point will be voted upon with a yes/no vote:

All points proposed to the agenda of the ALV will have a designated maintainer. In principle this will be the 
 originator of the point but the responsibility can be transferred or shared with mutual agreement of the current maintainer(s)
 and the prospective maintainers. The maintainer has a responsibility to appear during the ALV to present the point 
 and provide clarification. Failure for the maintainer to appear on the ALV, will make the point eligible for transfer to the next 
 ALV by the board.

4.2 b Vote

Points proposed for the agenda should have at least supporting votes by members on it. These members can also perform the function of maintainer for the purpose of presenting the point at the ALV. A majority of the board can also put points on the agenda, without this requirement.

The following point will be voted upon with a yes/no vote and a rangevote (2%-10%, 2% increments):

 A point proposed for the agenda of the ALV will have at least [range] supporting members on it, including the maintainer. 
 The amount of required supporting members are determined on the date of the announcement for the ALV. If no
 supporting votes have been found before the agenda deadline, the point will not be eligible for that ALV.
 In addition the board can decide to put points votable on the agenda.

Added by Vesna: If these points are accepted by vote, the text will be added to HHR.

4.3. Duration of ALV (Philip)

"When the date and time of an ALV is announced, the maximum duration is announced as well. Ideally, the maximum duration is at most three hours. Any items that cannot be discussed are moved to a next ALV, to be organized as soon as realistically possible. The board decides in what order items are discussed but gives priority to items left over from a previous ALV."

Rationale

Very long ALVs are a bad idea. The board should be allowed to change the order in which items are discussed provided that good progress is made on items the were left over from a previous ALV.

Supporters

• Phicoh (organizer)
• Stef
• rad0

https://wiki.techinc.nl/index.php/User:Phicoh/Votable_agenda_item_time_limit

Added by Vesna: If this points are accepted by vote, the text will be added to HHR.

4.4 Not changing membership fee amount too often (Maarten)

"Adjusting members' fee amount can ONLY be accomplished by notifying the treasurer *by* *email* of the change, 30 days prior. Misuse by changing too frequently etc. may lead to refusal of the request."

4.5 Regular fee payment schedule (Maarten)

"To streamline bookkeeping, there are ONLY two allowable ways to pay your members' fee: 1) yearly, in one payment. 2) monthly, provided that a set amount is paid at a set date each month."

4.6 Terms for board members (Wizzup)

4.6.1 Terms of the board members

A vote is to be cast on the terms of board members, in following order:

A: 1 Year

B: 18 Months (1.5 Year)

C: 2 Years

D: None

Note that this term is *per* board member. The exact time of the term should not be taken to literal, but rather, "resign the ALV whichever is closest to when my term ends".

4.6.2 Direct resignation of any board member exceeding term (Only if A, B or C) passes:

i: Board members exceeding term chosen in 0.0 are to resign effective immediately (after this ALV)

ii: Board members exceeding this term resign next ALV

Added by Vesna: If these points are accepted by vote, the following text will be added to HHR:

"Positions in the board have terms. Terms are per board member. Term starts when the board member is elected, and it lasts XX (A,B or C) years. Not in the exact months, but rounded up to the nearest ALV. At the expiration of the term, board member's position expires, and the board position is open for re-election. "

4.7 The "circle" (incomplete) (Wizzup)

The idea is to form a group - seperate from the board (and exclusive to any board member) to take over tasks that are not to be handled by the board, but currently are being handled by the board. This can vary heavily, but prime examples are:

• Overseeing structure of the new space (somewhat late now ;-))
• Overseeing resolution groups
• Managing various food supplies, other not directly important tasks

And all other (small and large) tasks that are currently expected of the board.

This group would report to the board on a semi-regular basis (currently not defined).

 DRAFT *** DRAFT *** DRAFT ***

 THIS TEXT IS NOT FOR FREE EDITING!!! TO GET POINTS ADDED, MAIL secretary@techinc.nl